Technically one of them was a Mage and two were merely powerful mortals, but point taken. And I suppose you could count them as consecutive? Not all of them went down on my first attempt, but I got all of them *eventually*.
We do have monarchies, but they're mostly constitutional monarchies these days, where the bulk of the governance is done by a Parliament or something like that and the actual monarchy itself is more for show. And my own country was always a republic, more or less.
[It is nice to know he managed to pull one over Claude, who is a very tricky customer.]
Honestly, thinking it over, 'consecutive' is kind of a meaningless word for me to have used. I mean, as opposed to what? Your being killed yourself in between assassinations? So yeah, I think it's fair to call any number of successful assassinations you've survived doing 'consecutive'.
Truth be told, the Leicester Alliance that I ran before heading back to Almyra was a ruling council of nobles, which...sounds a bit like what you're describing, I suppose. It was interesting, coming from a country of kings only to end up de facto leading a country that doesn't have them. If I've got nothing else going for me as king, I doubt any other king in history has had the benefit of getting experience beforehand in ruling a whole other country under a completely different style of government. If I can't use that expertise and knowledge to my advantage, then I've got to be my world's biggest fool.
I guess that's getting off-topic, though. Although at this point I'm not sure if we have any specific subject we're talking about or not.
I don't think we do, actually. I think we're talking just to talk, which is admittedly a terrible habit of mine--and yours as well, I suspect.
But honestly, Claude, I think your experience with other forms of governance will probably be the best asset you'll have as a king. If nothing else, it'll give you a lot more flexibility of mind than someone who's been used to the divine rule of kings. (I honestly don't know how much authority Almyra has in its monarchs, but I'm sure it's much more than the leading lord in an oligarchy might have.)
Hah. Truth be told, there's no such thing as a divine right of kings in Almyra. Fodlan has something like that, at least in the Holy Kingdom of Faerghus and the Adrestian Empire. The Alliance was the one country in Fodlan that bucked monarchies. Of course, they call them emperors rather than kings in the Empire, but beyond that the distinction's pretty meaningless. In Fodlan, people rule by bloodline. But in Almyra, they rule by merit first and foremost.
My father did pass down his crown to me, as it happens, but he won the crown in his youth. And it's entirely possible for me to lose it, if someone challenges me and wins. Most of Almyra works on meritocracy rules.
Our kings have a good chunk of authority, too, but honestly a lot of being king in Almyra is dealing with international affairs or infrastructural management your average Almyran warrior has no patience for. Though of course we're also the ones who make the laws, who decide our international policies, who have the final say in matters of peace and war, that sort of thing. But a lot of local affairs in far-flung areas of Almyra are governed more by local Almyran warlords than by any dictates of the king. The warlords do answer to the king, but the king often doesn't need to intervene in most day-to-day affairs.
Honestly, I feel like meritocracy's a better system than inheritance, when it comes to seats of power. Although I might be biased, of course, because that's how the seasonal crowns get passed along in a Changeling freehold--when a court's monarch steps down or dies or what have you, the crown appears on the brow of whatever Changeling best embodies that particular court. (Which means it's likely to be myself once the current monarch retires, because, well, I'm rather known for being an Autumn's Autumn, so to say.)
Does the empire even have any sub-kingdoms? Because as I understood it previously, you rather require those to have an empire for real and not just a kingdom calling itself an empire to sound better.
Huh. So the crown decides who's most worthy? It must be impressive magic for it to be able to tell.
As for the Empire, technically no. But originally the Adrestian Empire covered all of Fodlan. Then Faerghus broke away from the Empire, and sometime after that, the Alliance broke away from Faerghus, leading to the three countries. There were probably sub-kingdoms back at the time when the Empire was Fodlan, but that was so long ago that it's hard to know now. Besides, the Empire tends to be...overbearing, shall we say? I don't know how much individual identity any of those sub-kingdoms got to keep, and none of it may have been reflected in the history books they saw fit to print and preserve. One big happy imperialistic Empire.
It's not a physical crown, mind you. It's symbolic. Kind of misty. But unmistakable. And yes, it's very magical, but the Seasonal courts *do* have the power of those seasons behind them. That's how Changeling magic works, you see. We make contracts with concepts to lend us their power, the stronger the better.
And huh. That's interesting, regarding the Empire. The history part. The overbearing part is just part of being an empire, I'm afraid.
no subject
Date: 2021-05-10 03:32 am (UTC)We do have monarchies, but they're mostly constitutional monarchies these days, where the bulk of the governance is done by a Parliament or something like that and the actual monarchy itself is more for show. And my own country was always a republic, more or less.
[It is nice to know he managed to pull one over Claude, who is a very tricky customer.]
no subject
Date: 2021-05-18 06:46 am (UTC)Truth be told, the Leicester Alliance that I ran before heading back to Almyra was a ruling council of nobles, which...sounds a bit like what you're describing, I suppose. It was interesting, coming from a country of kings only to end up de facto leading a country that doesn't have them. If I've got nothing else going for me as king, I doubt any other king in history has had the benefit of getting experience beforehand in ruling a whole other country under a completely different style of government. If I can't use that expertise and knowledge to my advantage, then I've got to be my world's biggest fool.
I guess that's getting off-topic, though. Although at this point I'm not sure if we have any specific subject we're talking about or not.
no subject
Date: 2021-05-18 07:47 am (UTC)But honestly, Claude, I think your experience with other forms of governance will probably be the best asset you'll have as a king. If nothing else, it'll give you a lot more flexibility of mind than someone who's been used to the divine rule of kings. (I honestly don't know how much authority Almyra has in its monarchs, but I'm sure it's much more than the leading lord in an oligarchy might have.)
no subject
Date: 2021-05-18 08:02 am (UTC)My father did pass down his crown to me, as it happens, but he won the crown in his youth. And it's entirely possible for me to lose it, if someone challenges me and wins. Most of Almyra works on meritocracy rules.
Our kings have a good chunk of authority, too, but honestly a lot of being king in Almyra is dealing with international affairs or infrastructural management your average Almyran warrior has no patience for. Though of course we're also the ones who make the laws, who decide our international policies, who have the final say in matters of peace and war, that sort of thing. But a lot of local affairs in far-flung areas of Almyra are governed more by local Almyran warlords than by any dictates of the king. The warlords do answer to the king, but the king often doesn't need to intervene in most day-to-day affairs.
no subject
Date: 2021-05-18 08:21 am (UTC)Does the empire even have any sub-kingdoms? Because as I understood it previously, you rather require those to have an empire for real and not just a kingdom calling itself an empire to sound better.
no subject
Date: 2021-05-18 08:59 am (UTC)As for the Empire, technically no. But originally the Adrestian Empire covered all of Fodlan. Then Faerghus broke away from the Empire, and sometime after that, the Alliance broke away from Faerghus, leading to the three countries. There were probably sub-kingdoms back at the time when the Empire was Fodlan, but that was so long ago that it's hard to know now. Besides, the Empire tends to be...overbearing, shall we say? I don't know how much individual identity any of those sub-kingdoms got to keep, and none of it may have been reflected in the history books they saw fit to print and preserve. One big happy imperialistic Empire.
no subject
Date: 2021-05-18 09:47 am (UTC)And huh. That's interesting, regarding the Empire. The history part. The overbearing part is just part of being an empire, I'm afraid.